DJCB vs. COMB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN Series B (DJCB) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB).

DJCB and COMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DJCB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2019. COMB is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on May 22, 2017.

Performance

DJCB vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN Series B (DJCB) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DJCB vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DJCB ETRACS Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN Series B	0.00%	0.00%	3.39%	-8.96%	16.39%	28.75%	-3.90%	2.27%
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	24.42%	15.12%	5.24%	-7.75%	14.56%	26.34%	-2.95%	2.03%

Returns By Period

DJCB

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMB

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 11.58%
• YTD: 24.42%
• 6M: 31.07%
• 1Y: 31.68%
• 3Y*: 13.75%
• 5Y*: 13.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJCB vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJCB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.

DJCB

ETRACS Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN Series B

COMB

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

Return for Risk

DJCB vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMB

COMB Risk / Return Rank: 89
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 87
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJCB vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN Series B (DJCB) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DJCB	COMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.52	—

Correlation

The correlation between DJCB and COMB is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DJCB vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

DJCB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DJCB ETRACS Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN Series B	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	7.27%	9.05%	2.48%	6.57%	30.85%	15.83%	0.07%	1.48%	0.97%	0.20%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DJCB	COMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.50%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-12.25%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DJCB	COMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.80%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.18%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.53%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.05%	—