PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJAM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJAM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF Dist (DJAM.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJAM.DE achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than D6RQ.DE's 14.41% return.


DJAM.DE

1D
1.22%
1M
5.73%
YTD
8.12%
6M
8.61%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
12.59%

D6RQ.DE

1D
-0.56%
1M
8.70%
YTD
14.41%
6M
14.10%
1Y
33.24%
3Y*
23.10%
5Y*
17.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJAM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DJAM.DE
Lyxor Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF Dist
8.12%2.01%21.39%11.90%-2.34%31.92%7.77%
D6RQ.DE
Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
14.41%4.36%42.08%34.15%-22.07%41.44%12.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DJAM.DE and D6RQ.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020

0.74

The correlation between DJAM.DE and D6RQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJAM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJAM.DE
DJAM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DJAM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJAM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJAM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DJAM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJAM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

D6RQ.DE
D6RQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJAM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF Dist (DJAM.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJAM.DED6RQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.69

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

7.85

+1.37

DJAM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJAM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJAM.DE and D6RQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJAM.DED6RQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.23

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.97

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.09

-0.46

Drawdowns

DJAM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJAM.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, which is greater than D6RQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJAM.DE and D6RQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJAM.DED6RQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.32%

-27.29%

-20.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-12.28%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-27.29%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-27.29%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.84%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-5.82%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

4.22%

-2.01%

Volatility

DJAM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF Dist (DJAM.DE) is 2.87%, while Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that DJAM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than D6RQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJAM.DED6RQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

4.06%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

10.35%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

14.84%

-2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

17.79%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

17.56%

-1.47%

DJAM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJAM.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than D6RQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJAM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

DJAM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than D6RQ.DE's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
D6RQ.DE
Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
0.37%0.53%0.39%0.60%0.80%0.46%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DJAM.DE
Lyxor Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF Dist
0.73%0.79%1.17%1.06%1.80%1.11%1.62%1.25%1.90%1.71%2.26%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJAM.DE and D6RQ.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, D6RQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

D6RQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DJAM.DE.

DJAM.DE tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average, while D6RQ.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Deka. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DJAM.DE and 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJAM.DE and D6RQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer