DIVZ vs. NFXS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVZ is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIVZ returned 11.27% vs 52.79% for NFXS. Their -0.17 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DIVZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.

Performance

DIVZ vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVZ achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.98% return.

DIVZ

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 0.59%
• 6M: 3.13%
• YTD: 7.08%
• 1Y: 11.27%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: 9.79%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.43%

NFXS

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 7.73%
• 6M: 11.04%
• YTD: 24.98%
• 1Y: 52.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -5.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	$843.62K	$1.68M	$1.36M
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	$587.15K	$968.11K	$646.26K

DIVZ vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	7.08%	16.72%	-1.95%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	24.98%	-8.56%	-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVZ and NFXS is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.17

Return for Risk

DIVZ vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIVZ

DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 46
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 42

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 58
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIVZ vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIVZ	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	1.52	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.13	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.30	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	1.70	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	4.60	-0.10

DIVZ vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVZ and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIVZ vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVZ drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, smaller than the maximum NFXS drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVZ and NFXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVZ	NFXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.42%	-50.37%	+34.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.83%	-31.31%	+25.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	-12.34%	+9.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-30.81%	+27.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	11.54%	-9.02%

Volatility

DIVZ vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) is 3.87%, while Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that DIVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVZ	NFXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	10.93%	-7.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.84%	28.44%	-20.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.00%	35.05%	-25.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.66%	34.93%	-22.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.56%	34.93%	-22.37%

DIVZ vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVZ vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than NFXS's 2.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	2.47%	2.60%	2.63%	3.66%	3.23%	3.83%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	2.83%	3.53%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVZ and NFXS in my portfolio?

DIVZ and NFXS have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVZ or NFXS?

NFXS has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to DIVZ (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVZ dropped -15.42% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

Which ETF is better, DIVZ or NFXS?

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 52.79% vs 11.27% for DIVZ. On fees, DIVZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DIVZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVZ or NFXS?

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 52.79% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVZ or NFXS?

DIVZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVZ or NFXS?

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.47% for DIVZ.

What is the main difference between DIVZ and NFXS?

DIVZ is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVZ and 1.03% for NFXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.