PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVZ vs. JULZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DIVZ vs. JULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DIVZ vs. JULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
3.04%16.72%18.44%-0.51%3.51%19.74%
JULZ
Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF
-4.68%13.23%18.76%17.65%-9.34%19.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVZ achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly higher than JULZ's -4.68% return.


DIVZ

1D
0.18%
1M
-4.56%
YTD
3.04%
6M
3.75%
1Y
12.65%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

JULZ

1D
2.26%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
-4.68%
6M
-3.09%
1Y
11.99%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DIVZ vs. JULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than JULZ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DIVZ vs. JULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVZ
DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

JULZ
JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVZ vs. JULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVZJULZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

0.86

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

1.32

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.35

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.66

5.61

+1.05

DIVZ vs. JULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the JULZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVZ and JULZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVZJULZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.86

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.77

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.97

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between DIVZ and JULZ is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DIVZ vs. JULZ - Dividend Comparison

DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than JULZ's 12.55% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
2.68%2.60%2.63%3.66%3.23%3.83%
JULZ
Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF
12.55%11.96%3.30%3.59%0.07%0.00%

Drawdowns

DIVZ vs. JULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVZ drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, roughly equal to the maximum JULZ drawdown of -14.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVZ and JULZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVZJULZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-14.71%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-9.10%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

-14.71%

-0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.56%

-6.46%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-3.04%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.20%

-0.14%

Volatility

DIVZ vs. JULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) is 2.80%, while Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that DIVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DIVZJULZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

4.42%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.57%

8.13%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

14.04%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.58%

12.18%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

12.36%

+0.25%