DIVZ vs. BAMV

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) and BAMV (Brookstone Value Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIVZ returned 11.27% vs 13.63% for BAMV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BAMV.

Performance

DIVZ vs. BAMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVZ achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than BAMV's 11.85% return.

DIVZ

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 0.50%
• 6M: 5.39%
• YTD: 6.43%
• 1Y: 11.27%
• 3Y*: 14.93%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: —

BAMV

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.39%
• 6M: 8.90%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 1Y: 13.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVZ vs. BAMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	6.43%	16.72%	18.44%	6.05%
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	11.85%	7.66%	12.03%	13.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVZ and BAMV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	0.68

The correlation between DIVZ and BAMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIVZ vs. BAMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIVZ	BAMV
Consumer Defensive	19.6%	0.8%
Healthcare	19.5%	9.8%
Energy	14.3%	5.9%
Utilities	13.1%	0.3%
Industrials	10.3%	10.4%
Financial Services	9.0%	28.3%
Basic Materials	5.7%	4.9%
Communication Services	5.2%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	3.8%	2.1%
Technology	3.2%	26.0%
Real Estate	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

DIVZ vs. BAMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVZ

DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 41
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 37
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BAMV

BAMV Risk / Return Rank: 45
BAMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
BAMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
BAMV Omega Ratio Rank: 37
BAMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BAMV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVZ vs. BAMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIVZ	BAMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.15	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.70	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.20	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.20	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	6.60	-2.08

DIVZ vs. BAMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the BAMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVZ and BAMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIVZ vs. BAMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVZ drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, which is greater than BAMV's maximum drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVZ and BAMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVZ	BAMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.42%	-14.56%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.83%	-6.23%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	0.00%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	-1.97%	-1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	2.07%	+0.43%

Volatility

DIVZ vs. BAMV - Volatility Comparison

Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) at 3.20%. This indicates that DIVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVZ	BAMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	3.20%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.57%	8.54%	-0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.70%	11.94%	-2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.65%	13.65%	-1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.56%	13.65%	-1.09%

DIVZ vs. BAMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMV's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVZ vs. BAMV - Dividend Comparison

DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than BAMV's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	1.25%	1.32%	3.66%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	2.53%	2.60%	2.63%	3.66%	3.23%	3.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVZ and BAMV in my portfolio?

DIVZ and BAMV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVZ or BAMV?

DIVZ has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to BAMV (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVZ dropped -15.42% vs BAMV's -14.56%.

Which ETF is better, DIVZ or BAMV?

On 1-year performance, BAMV leads with 13.63% vs 11.27% for DIVZ. On fees, DIVZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BAMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVZ or BAMV?

Over the 1-year period, BAMV has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVZ or BAMV?

DIVZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVZ or BAMV?

DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.25% for BAMV.

What is the main difference between DIVZ and BAMV?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVZ and 0.95% for BAMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.