DIVO vs. OMAH

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIVO returned 15.40% vs 12.59% for OMAH. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

DIVO vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 8.87% return.

DIVO

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 4.58%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 1Y: 15.40%
• 3Y*: 14.69%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 2.34%
• 6M: 9.28%
• YTD: 8.87%
• 1Y: 12.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVO vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	6.60%	15.33%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	8.87%	6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVO and OMAH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025	0.73

The correlation between DIVO and OMAH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVO vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIVO	OMAH
Financial Services	30.0%	37.3%
Technology	16.1%	11.6%
Industrials	14.6%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	4.1%
Healthcare	7.6%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.5%	13.2%
Energy	6.7%	8.8%
Basic Materials	4.0%	-
Utilities	2.0%	-
Communication Services	1.0%	19.8%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

DIVO vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVO

DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 65
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVO vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIVO	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.54	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.17	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.27	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	4.21	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.17	9.93	-0.76

DIVO vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVO and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIVO vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVO	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.04%	-11.83%	-18.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.95%	-3.00%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.32%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-1.25%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	1.27%	+0.41%

Volatility

DIVO vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) is 2.45%, while VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that DIVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVO	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	2.79%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.05%	5.74%	+1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.19%	8.21%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.93%	12.90%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.79%	12.90%	+1.89%

DIVO vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVO vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, less than OMAH's 14.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	6.41%	6.44%	4.70%	4.67%	4.76%	4.79%	4.91%	8.16%	5.27%	3.83%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.98%	12.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVO and OMAH in my portfolio?

DIVO and OMAH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVO or OMAH?

OMAH has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to DIVO (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, DIVO or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, DIVO leads with 15.40% vs 12.59% for OMAH. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVO or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 15.40% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVO or OMAH?

DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVO or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.98%, compared with 6.41% for DIVO.

What is the main difference between DIVO and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.