DIVO vs. CWII
DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.
Performance
DIVO vs. CWII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 13,199.78% return.
DIVO
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 18.55%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
CWII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10,273.16%
- YTD
- 13,199.78%
- 6M
- 11,535.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVO vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.44% | 2.33% |
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 13,199.78% | -45.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVO and CWII is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVO vs. CWII — Risk / Return Rank
DIVO
CWII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIVO vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVO | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVO vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and CWII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVO | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.04% | -51.04% | +21.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | 0.00% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -33.26% | +30.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | — | — |
Volatility
DIVO vs. CWII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVO | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.22% | 13,701.30% | -13,692.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 13,701.30% | -13,689.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 13,701.30% | -13,686.47% |
DIVO vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVO vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison
DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, less than CWII's 123.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 123.26% | 6.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.42% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVO and CWII have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.
CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 6.42% for DIVO.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 1.03% for CWII.
Find the right allocation for DIVO and CWII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer