PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVGX vs. QCELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVGX vs. QCELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVGX achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly lower than QCELX's 18.09% return.


DIVGX

1D
0.75%
1M
2.99%
YTD
9.83%
6M
9.62%
1Y
17.18%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*

QCELX

1D
-0.25%
1M
6.79%
YTD
18.09%
6M
19.95%
1Y
38.37%
3Y*
27.48%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
15.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVGX vs. QCELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DIVGX
Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund
9.83%13.62%16.20%19.48%-14.64%27.43%9.47%10.67%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
18.09%23.38%22.73%26.30%-15.73%27.18%14.93%7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVGX and QCELX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019

0.86

The correlation between DIVGX and QCELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVGX vs. QCELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVGX
DIVGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DIVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QCELX
QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVGX vs. QCELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVGXQCELXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

3.11

-1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

4.21

-1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.55

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

5.00

-2.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.53

23.00

-12.47

DIVGX vs. QCELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the QCELX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVGX and QCELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVGXQCELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

3.11

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.86

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.72

+0.02

Drawdowns

DIVGX vs. QCELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVGX drawdown since its inception was -32.33%, roughly equal to the maximum QCELX drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVGX and QCELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVGXQCELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.33%

-33.52%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-7.92%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.35%

-18.38%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.86%

-28.70%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-5.66%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.72%

-0.08%

Volatility

DIVGX vs. QCELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) is 2.57%, while AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that DIVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVGXQCELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

3.06%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.23%

9.34%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.38%

12.75%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

18.93%

-5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

18.97%

-2.30%

DIVGX vs. QCELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QCELX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVGX vs. QCELX - Dividend Comparison

DIVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.69%, more than QCELX's 12.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVGX
Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund
24.69%27.35%1.15%1.46%3.08%1.36%1.22%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
12.19%14.40%12.89%13.67%11.05%12.41%9.94%5.36%7.81%0.99%1.28%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVGX and QCELX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCELX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to DIVGX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVGX dropped -32.33% vs QCELX's -33.52%.

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVGX and QCELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer