DIVGX vs. NWAUX
DIVGX (Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund) and NWAUX (Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DIVGX returned 11.24%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for NWAUX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NWAUX.
Performance
DIVGX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVGX achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly higher than NWAUX's 7.43% return.
DIVGX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 17.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- —
NWAUX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVGX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVGX Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund | 9.83% | 13.62% | 16.20% | 19.48% | -14.64% | 26.89% |
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund | 7.43% | -4.92% | 27.90% | 18.30% | -3.23% | 22.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVGX and NWAUX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DIVGX and NWAUX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVGX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank
DIVGX
NWAUX
DIVGX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVGX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 0.52 | +1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 0.82 | +1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.09 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 0.78 | +1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 1.73 | +8.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVGX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 0.52 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.66 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.78 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
DIVGX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVGX drawdown since its inception was -32.33%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVGX and NWAUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVGX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.33% | -21.07% | -11.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -6.70% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.35% | -19.31% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.86% | -21.07% | -2.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.95% | +8.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -6.93% | +2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 3.02% | -1.38% |
Volatility
DIVGX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) is 2.57%, while Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that DIVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVGX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 3.47% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.23% | 7.67% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.38% | 10.04% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 16.09% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 15.93% | +0.74% |
DIVGX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVGX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison
DIVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.69%, more than NWAUX's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVGX Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund | 24.69% | 27.35% | 1.15% | 1.46% | 3.08% | 1.36% | 1.22% | 1.03% |
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund | 4.79% | 4.35% | 13.58% | 0.40% | 1.93% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVGX and NWAUX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NWAUX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to DIVGX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVGX dropped -32.33% vs NWAUX's -21.07%.
DIVGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVGX and NWAUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer