PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVG vs. WEEK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVG vs. WEEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVG achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly higher than WEEK's 1.65% return.


DIVG

1D
0.47%
1M
0.17%
YTD
12.11%
6M
11.72%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WEEK

1D
0.01%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVG vs. WEEK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DIVG and WEEK is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVG vs. WEEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVG
DIVG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DIVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

WEEK
WEEK Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
WEEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEEK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
WEEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVG vs. WEEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVGWEEKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-15.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

4.42

-3.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

29.62

-25.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.45

256.61

-243.16

DIVG vs. WEEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVG Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the WEEK Sharpe Ratio of 9.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVG and WEEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVG vs. WEEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVG drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than WEEK's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVG and WEEK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVGWEEKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-0.13%

-14.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-0.13%

-5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

0.00%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-0.01%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

0.01%

+1.60%

Volatility

DIVG vs. WEEK - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) at 0.13%. This indicates that DIVG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVGWEEKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

0.13%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

0.27%

+7.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.85%

0.43%

+10.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

0.39%

+12.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.17%

0.39%

+12.78%

DIVG vs. WEEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than WEEK's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVG vs. WEEK - Dividend Comparison

DIVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than WEEK's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DIVG
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF
3.32%3.15%4.08%
WEEK
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF
3.70%3.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVG and WEEK have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVG has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to WEEK (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVG dropped -14.95% vs WEEK's -0.13%.

On 1-year performance, DIVG leads with 21.59% vs 3.83% for WEEK. On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WEEK has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVG has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 3.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DIVG.

WEEK has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 3.32% for DIVG.

DIVG is categorized as S&P 500, while WEEK is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DIVG and 0.19% for WEEK.

WEEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.04 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVG and WEEK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer