DIV vs. IWS
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - DIV tracks the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index while IWS tracks the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 4.30%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for IWS. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
DIV vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed IWS with an annualized return of 4.30%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
IWS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
DIV vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 16.45% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and IWS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.79 |
The correlation between DIV and IWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIV vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIV
IWS
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
-
Energy
DIV
IWS
Real Estate
DIV
IWS
Utilities
DIV
IWS
Industrials
DIV
IWS
Consumer Defensive
DIV
IWS
Communication Services
DIV
IWS
Basic Materials
DIV
IWS
Financial Services
DIV
IWS
Consumer Cyclical
DIV
IWS
Healthcare
DIV
IWS
Technology
DIV
-
IWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
IWS
DIV vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIV | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.68 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | 13.82 | -5.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIV vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -62.40% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -7.53% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -20.57% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -21.23% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | -43.83% | -8.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | 0.00% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -8.01% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.00% | -0.12% |
Volatility
DIV vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.07%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 4.29% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.08% | 9.97% | -2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 13.53% | -3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 17.36% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 19.37% | -1.39% |
DIV vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than IWS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.32% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and IWS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWS has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.51% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 1.32% for IWS.
DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.23% for IWS.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer