PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIV vs. DVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIV vs. DVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly higher than DVLU's 10.79% return.


DIV

1D
1.81%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
13.39%
6M
13.87%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*
4.14%

DVLU

1D
0.30%
1M
4.14%
YTD
10.79%
6M
8.85%
1Y
36.17%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIV vs. DVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
13.39%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-9.61%
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
10.79%23.67%13.36%18.84%-9.73%41.67%-6.68%33.59%-24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DIV and DVLU is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between DIV and DVLU has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIV vs. DVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

DVLU
DVLU Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIV vs. DVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVDVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.97

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

10.71

-2.61

DIV vs. DVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the DVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIV and DVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIV vs. DVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, roughly equal to the maximum DVLU drawdown of -53.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and DVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVDVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.74%

-53.26%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.23%

-12.24%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.33%

-24.86%

+12.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-24.86%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-0.65%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-8.73%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

3.39%

-1.47%

Volatility

DIV vs. DVLU - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVDVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.70%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

12.34%

-4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.64%

16.43%

-5.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

21.39%

-7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

25.73%

-7.73%

DIV vs. DVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DVLU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIV vs. DVLU - Dividend Comparison

DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than DVLU's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.77%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
0.62%0.73%1.06%1.34%2.18%1.33%1.34%1.71%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIV and DVLU have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVLU has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to DIV (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs DVLU's -53.26%.

On 5-year performance, DVLU leads with 12.25% vs 5.62% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DVLU has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 5.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVLU.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 0.62% for DVLU.

DIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DVLU is Momentum. DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while DVLU tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.60% for DVLU.

DVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIV and DVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer