PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISMX vs. QISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISMX vs. QISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DISMX) and Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISMX achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than QISIX's 17.52% return.


DISMX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.45%
6M
2.42%
YTD
6.44%
1Y
11.26%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
7.30%

QISIX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.58%
6M
16.03%
YTD
17.52%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISMX vs. QISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DISMX
DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio
6.44%27.95%1.30%11.55%-25.16%9.27%16.42%15.19%
QISIX
Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund
17.52%18.14%-5.09%16.38%-19.17%3.48%13.72%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DISMX and QISIX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between DISMX and QISIX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISMX vs. QISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISMX
DISMX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QISIX
QISIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISMX vs. QISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DISMX) and Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DISMXQISIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.27

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

1.90

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

6.27

-3.08

DISMX vs. QISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the QISIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISMX and QISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DISMX vs. QISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISMX drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, roughly equal to the maximum QISIX drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISMX and QISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISMXQISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-41.11%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-10.48%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-15.47%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.53%

-37.79%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-3.23%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.44%

-11.94%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.16%

+0.16%

Volatility

DISMX vs. QISIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DISMX) is 4.69%, while Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that DISMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISMXQISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

5.15%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

12.07%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

13.86%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

15.06%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.04%

+0.13%

DISMX vs. QISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISMX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than QISIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISMX vs. QISIX - Dividend Comparison

DISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than QISIX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DISMX
DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio
1.90%1.98%2.48%2.15%2.17%1.89%1.11%2.31%5.59%3.79%1.73%2.75%
QISIX
Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund
1.61%1.89%3.29%1.27%1.66%2.52%0.68%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DISMX and QISIX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QISIX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to DISMX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISMX dropped -41.53% vs QISIX's -41.11%.

QISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISMX and QISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer