PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISMX vs. DFVQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISMX vs. DFVQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DISMX) and DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio (DFVQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISMX achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly lower than DFVQX's 11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, DISMX has underperformed DFVQX with an annualized return of 7.14%, while DFVQX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.


DISMX

1D
0.05%
1M
3.29%
YTD
8.33%
6M
10.94%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*
7.14%

DFVQX

1D
0.25%
1M
3.28%
YTD
11.85%
6M
15.01%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISMX vs. DFVQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DISMX
DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio
8.33%27.95%1.30%11.55%-25.16%9.27%16.42%25.78%-17.96%34.06%
DFVQX
DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio
11.85%38.02%4.55%17.05%-12.54%15.01%6.10%20.87%-19.03%27.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DISMX and DFVQX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.94

The correlation between DISMX and DFVQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISMX vs. DFVQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISMX
DISMX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
DISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DFVQX
DFVQX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DFVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DFVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISMX vs. DFVQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DISMX) and DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio (DFVQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DISMXDFVQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

2.18

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

3.02

-1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

2.69

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.25

10.47

-5.22

DISMX vs. DFVQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the DFVQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISMX and DFVQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DISMXDFVQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.18

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.67

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.61

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.61

-0.11

Drawdowns

DISMX vs. DFVQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISMX drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, smaller than the maximum DFVQX drawdown of -44.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISMX and DFVQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISMXDFVQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-44.58%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-10.98%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-13.00%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.53%

-28.33%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.53%

-44.58%

+3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.65%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-7.85%

-2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

2.80%

+0.43%

Volatility

DISMX vs. DFVQX - Volatility Comparison

DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DISMX) and DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio (DFVQX) have volatilities of 3.88% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISMXDFVQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

4.02%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

11.02%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

13.62%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

15.64%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

16.54%

-0.14%

DISMX vs. DFVQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISMX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than DFVQX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISMX vs. DFVQX - Dividend Comparison

DISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than DFVQX's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFVQX
DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio
2.91%3.06%3.56%3.47%2.73%4.76%1.79%2.68%5.96%1.81%2.15%2.77%
DISMX
DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio
1.82%1.98%2.48%2.15%2.17%1.89%1.11%2.31%5.59%3.79%1.73%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DISMX and DFVQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFVQX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to DISMX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISMX dropped -41.53% vs DFVQX's -44.58%.

DFVQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISMX and DFVQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer