DISK vs. ARMY
DISK (Tema Memory ETF) and ARMY (Tema International Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DISK is a Semiconductors fund actively managed by Tema, while ARMY is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DISK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for ARMY.
Performance
DISK vs. ARMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DISK
- 1D
- -9.86%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARMY
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 8.69%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.62K | $60.01K | $94.56K | |
DISK Tema Memory ETF | $13.68M | $15.67M | $15.67M |
DISK vs. ARMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DISK Tema Memory ETF | -30.68% |
ARMY Tema International Defense ETF | 6.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DISK and ARMY is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2026 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DISK vs. ARMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Memory ETF (DISK) and Tema International Defense ETF (ARMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DISK vs. ARMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DISK drawdown since its inception was -32.90%, which is greater than ARMY's maximum drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISK and ARMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DISK | ARMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.90% | -16.37% | -16.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.90% | -9.10% | -23.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.04% | -7.57% | -13.47% |
Volatility
DISK vs. ARMY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DISK | ARMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.87% | 31.83% | +79.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.87% | 31.83% | +79.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.87% | 31.83% | +79.04% |
DISK vs. ARMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DISK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMY's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DISK vs. ARMY - Dividend Comparison
Neither DISK nor ARMY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DISK and ARMY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMY is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMY is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DISK.
DISK and ARMY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DISK is categorized as Semiconductors, while ARMY is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DISK and 0.68% for ARMY.
Find the right allocation for DISK and ARMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer