PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DISC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DISC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

DISC.TO (BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and ZNQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DISC.TO is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by BMO, while ZNQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, DISC.TO returned 5.39%/yr vs 19.23%/yr for ZNQ.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DISC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF (DISC.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISC.TO achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than ZNQ.TO's 23.99% return.

DISC.TO

1D
-0.36%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
-4.66%
6M
-4.88%
1Y
0.44%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
—

ZNQ.TO

1D
1.63%
1M
2.62%
YTD
23.99%
6M
23.16%
1Y
39.20%
3Y*
29.08%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DISC.TO
BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF		-4.66%7.78%22.18%32.83%-27.25%18.75%26.48%18.20%
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF		23.99%14.95%35.84%51.32%-28.06%26.59%44.65%22.53%

Correlation

The correlation between DISC.TO and ZNQ.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2019

0.45

The correlation between DISC.TO and ZNQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF

Often compared with ZNQ.TO:
ZNQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOZNQ.TO vs. QQC.TOZNQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOZNQ.TO vs. TEC.TOZNQ.TO vs. VFV.TOZNQ.TO vs. QQQZNQ.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Return for Risk

DISC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DISC.TO
DISC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DISC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DISC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO
ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF (DISC.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DISC.TOZNQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.03
2.22

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.14
2.90

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.40

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

3.22

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.09

10.03

-9.94

DISC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISC.TO and ZNQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DISC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISC.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than ZNQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISC.TO and ZNQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DISC.TOZNQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-32.09%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-12.24%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.78%

-22.67%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.93%

-32.09%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.24%

-0.30%

-6.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-6.59%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

3.92%

+0.78%

Volatility

DISC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF (DISC.TO) is 4.22%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that DISC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DISC.TOZNQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

9.27%

-5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

14.58%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

17.76%

-4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

21.15%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

22.46%

-3.53%

Dividends

DISC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

DISC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than ZNQ.TO's 0.20% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DISC.TO
BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF		0.63%0.66%0.83%1.01%1.14%0.74%0.93%1.32%1.80%0.95%
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF		0.20%0.25%0.30%0.35%0.23%0.12%0.47%0.52%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

DISC.TO and ZNQ.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DISC.TO is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ZNQ.TO is Nasdaq-100.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISC.TO and ZNQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer