DISC.TO vs. ZAG.TO
DISC.TO (BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and ZAG.TO (BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DISC.TO is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by BMO, while ZAG.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. Over the past 5 years, DISC.TO returned 5.39%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for ZAG.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DISC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DISC.TO achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than ZAG.TO's 2.13% return.
DISC.TO
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- 0.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- —
ZAG.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 3.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
DISC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DISC.TO BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF | -4.66% | 7.78% | 22.18% | 32.83% | -27.25% | 18.75% | 26.48% | 26.34% | -7.29% | 14.18% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 2.13% | 2.25% | 4.48% | 6.41% | -11.60% | -2.60% | 8.34% | 6.84% | 1.12% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DISC.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2017 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DISC.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DISC.TO
ZAG.TO
DISC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF (DISC.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DISC.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.13 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 1.14 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 2.79 | -2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DISC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DISC.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than ZAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISC.TO and ZAG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DISC.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -18.03% | -17.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -2.79% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.78% | -5.42% | -15.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.93% | -15.77% | -17.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.24% | -0.67% | -6.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -3.53% | -3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 1.19% | +3.51% |
Volatility
DISC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF (DISC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) at 1.09%. This indicates that DISC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DISC.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 1.09% | +3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 3.37% | +7.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 4.45% | +9.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 6.58% | +12.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 7.11% | +11.82% |
Dividends
DISC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison
DISC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than ZAG.TO's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DISC.TO BMO Global Consumer Discretionary Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 0.63% | 0.66% | 0.83% | 1.01% | 1.14% | 0.74% | 0.93% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.40% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 3.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DISC.TO and ZAG.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DISC.TO is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ZAG.TO is Canadian Government Bonds.
Find the right allocation for DISC.TO and ZAG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer