DIPSX vs. FSPWX
DIPSX (DFA Inflation-Protected Securities Portfolio) and FSPWX (Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past year, DIPSX returned 4.08% vs 5.38% for FSPWX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIPSX charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FSPWX.
Performance
DIPSX vs. FSPWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DIPSX having a 1.80% return and FSPWX slightly higher at 1.83%.
DIPSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
FSPWX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIPSX vs. FSPWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPSX DFA Inflation-Protected Securities Portfolio | 1.80% | 5.77% | -1.56% |
FSPWX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 1.83% | 6.76% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIPSX and FSPWX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DIPSX and FSPWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIPSX vs. FSPWX — Risk / Return Rank
DIPSX
FSPWX
DIPSX vs. FSPWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Inflation-Protected Securities Portfolio (DIPSX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIPSX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.67 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | 8.19 | -2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIPSX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.56 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.00 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
DIPSX vs. FSPWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIPSX drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, which is greater than FSPWX's maximum drawdown of -3.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPSX and FSPWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIPSX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -3.84% | -10.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.03% | -1.95% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -0.98% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.64% | +0.09% |
Volatility
DIPSX vs. FSPWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Inflation-Protected Securities Portfolio (DIPSX) is 0.87%, while Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that DIPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIPSX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 0.92% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | 2.28% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 3.35% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 4.06% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 4.06% | +1.65% |
DIPSX vs. FSPWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIPSX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPWX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DIPSX vs. FSPWX - Dividend Comparison
DIPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than FSPWX's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIPSX DFA Inflation-Protected Securities Portfolio | 2.02% | 2.43% | 2.70% | 3.73% | 8.14% | 4.86% | 1.58% | 2.12% | 2.28% | 2.64% | 1.99% | 0.69% |
FSPWX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 3.76% | 4.19% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DIPSX and FSPWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FSPWX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to DIPSX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPSX dropped -14.64% vs FSPWX's -3.84%.
FSPWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIPSX and FSPWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer