PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DINDX vs. TIIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DINDX vs. TIIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DINDX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Core Fixed Income Fund (TIIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DINDX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TIIUX

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.44%
1Y
3.05%
3Y*
3.24%
5Y*
-0.74%
10Y*
1.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DINDX vs. TIIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DINDX
Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
0.00%8.28%6.76%8.49%-7.06%0.01%5.10%9.59%-1.28%7.54%
TIIUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Core Fixed Income Fund
0.20%5.77%0.61%5.90%-14.72%-1.70%8.67%9.76%-0.45%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DINDX and TIIUX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 1997

0.45

The correlation between DINDX and TIIUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.69 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DINDX vs. TIIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DINDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TIIUX
TIIUX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TIIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TIIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DINDX vs. TIIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DINDX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Core Fixed Income Fund (TIIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DINDXTIIUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

DINDX vs. TIIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DINDX vs. TIIUX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DINDXTIIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

Volatility

DINDX vs. TIIUX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DINDXTIIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.16%

DINDX vs. TIIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DINDX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than TIIUX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

DINDX vs. TIIUX - Dividend Comparison

DINDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DINDX
Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
2.27%4.69%5.36%4.69%5.82%3.52%2.98%3.43%3.68%3.13%6.24%4.80%
TIIUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Core Fixed Income Fund
3.34%2.92%4.51%3.91%2.88%2.36%5.77%3.08%2.93%2.49%3.60%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


DINDX and TIIUX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DINDX and TIIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer