DIME vs. EZBC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DIME (CoinShares Altcoins ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. DIME is actively managed, while EZBC is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIME charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

DIME vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoinShares Altcoins ETF (DIME) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIME achieves a -32.39% return, which is significantly lower than EZBC's -26.62% return.

DIME

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -9.12%
• 6M: -39.17%
• YTD: -32.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -2.11%
• 6M: -32.60%
• YTD: -26.62%
• 1Y: -46.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIME vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DIME CoinShares Altcoins ETF	-32.39%	-58.28%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-26.62%	-30.39%

Correlation

The correlation between DIME and EZBC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

DIME vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIME vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Altcoins ETF (DIME) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIME	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.59	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.82	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.87	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.40	—

Drawdowns

DIME vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIME drawdown since its inception was -73.50%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIME and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIME	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.50%	-53.35%	-20.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.79%	-48.92%	-22.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.52%	-17.75%	-41.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	33.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DIME	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.80%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.54%	44.30%	+32.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.54%	49.84%	+26.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	76.54%	49.84%	+26.70%

DIME vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIME has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DIME vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

Neither DIME nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIME and EZBC in my portfolio?

DIME and EZBC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DIME or EZBC?

On fees, DIME is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIME or EZBC?

DIME is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZBC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIME or EZBC?

DIME and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DIME and EZBC?

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for DIME and 0.19% for EZBC.