PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHYA.L vs. HYSD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHYA.L vs. HYSD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DHYA.L) and iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DHYA.L is traded in USD, while HYSD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HYSD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DHYA.L having a 1.83% return and HYSD.L slightly higher at 1.91%.


DHYA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
6M
1.52%
YTD
1.83%
1Y
5.71%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*

HYSD.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.52%
6M
1.83%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHYA.L vs. HYSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DHYA.L
iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.83%8.46%8.26%12.33%-3.24%
HYSD.L
iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.91%16.41%5.80%17.64%-4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DHYA.L and HYSD.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022

0.56

The correlation between DHYA.L and HYSD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHYA.L vs. HYSD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHYA.L
DHYA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DHYA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHYA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHYA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DHYA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHYA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HYSD.L
HYSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHYA.L vs. HYSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DHYA.L) and iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHYA.LHYSD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.12

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

0.89

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

2.30

+7.31

DHYA.L vs. HYSD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHYA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHYA.L and HYSD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHYA.L vs. HYSD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHYA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum HYSD.L drawdown of -20.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHYA.L and HYSD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHYA.LHYSD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-20.02%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.58%

-6.47%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.20%

-9.26%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-1.59%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-3.24%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

2.49%

-1.90%

Volatility

DHYA.L vs. HYSD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DHYA.L) is 0.88%, while iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that DHYA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHYA.LHYSD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

2.10%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.61%

6.56%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

8.56%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.33%

12.07%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.83%

12.07%

-4.24%

DHYA.L vs. HYSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHYA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HYSD.L's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DHYA.L vs. HYSD.L - Dividend Comparison

DHYA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHYA.L and HYSD.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYSD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYSD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DHYA.L.

DHYA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while HYSD.L tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DHYA.L and 0.22% for HYSD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHYA.L and HYSD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer