PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHSCX vs. TASVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHSCX vs. TASVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHSCX achieves a 27.91% return, which is significantly higher than TASVX's 23.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DHSCX having a 10.63% annualized return and TASVX not far ahead at 11.15%.


DHSCX

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.26%
6M
19.95%
YTD
27.91%
1Y
42.53%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
10.63%
ALL TIME*
10.18%

TASVX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.82%
6M
16.72%
YTD
23.55%
1Y
46.66%
3Y*
21.28%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
11.15%
ALL TIME*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DHSCX vs. TASVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHSCX
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund
27.91%11.48%12.75%23.99%-15.11%32.30%-0.54%21.45%-15.23%10.56%
TASVX
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund
23.55%13.71%18.76%16.92%-11.44%41.68%-3.08%15.56%-19.00%6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DHSCX and TASVX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2000

0.93

The correlation between DHSCX and TASVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHSCX vs. TASVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DHSCX
DHSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DHSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DHSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TASVX
TASVX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TASVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TASVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TASVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TASVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TASVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DHSCX vs. TASVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHSCXTASVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

4.83

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.34

17.05

-5.71

DHSCX vs. TASVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the TASVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHSCX and TASVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHSCX vs. TASVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHSCX drawdown since its inception was -53.15%, smaller than the maximum TASVX drawdown of -59.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHSCX and TASVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHSCXTASVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.15%

-59.79%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-8.75%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.41%

-23.91%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.41%

-24.62%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.19%

-59.79%

+13.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.85%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-8.46%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

2.48%

+0.90%

Volatility

DHSCX vs. TASVX - Volatility Comparison

Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) at 3.49%. This indicates that DHSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TASVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHSCXTASVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

3.49%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

11.51%

+2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.87%

16.84%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

22.38%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

26.35%

-4.11%

DHSCX vs. TASVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHSCX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than TASVX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHSCX vs. TASVX - Dividend Comparison

DHSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than TASVX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHSCX
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund
4.54%5.80%16.10%30.73%18.17%17.43%0.32%6.94%10.29%6.68%2.50%1.63%
TASVX
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund
1.05%1.29%26.54%3.43%22.08%1.46%1.38%2.81%10.87%13.42%1.83%45.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHSCX and TASVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHSCX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to TASVX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHSCX dropped -53.15% vs TASVX's -59.79%.

TASVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHSCX and TASVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer