DHSCX vs. ARSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX).
DHSCX is managed by Diamond Hill. It was launched on Dec 29, 2000. ARSMX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Mar 29, 2007.
Performance
DHSCX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DHSCX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund | 0.74% | 11.48% | 12.75% | 23.99% | -15.11% | 32.30% | -0.54% | 21.45% | -15.23% | 10.56% |
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | -3.04% | -0.83% | 12.42% | 14.48% | -8.62% | 23.41% | 1.71% | 34.82% | -6.44% | 15.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHSCX achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's -3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, DHSCX has underperformed ARSMX with an annualized return of 8.55%, while ARSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.33% annualized return.
DHSCX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 27.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.55%
ARSMX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -3.04%
- 6M
- -5.91%
- 1Y
- -0.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DHSCX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHSCX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DHSCX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank
DHSCX
ARSMX
DHSCX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DHSCX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | -0.02 | +1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 0.10 | +1.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.01 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | -0.18 | +2.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | -0.55 | +6.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DHSCX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | -0.02 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.23 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.48 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.35 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between DHSCX and ARSMX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DHSCX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison
DHSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, while ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund | 5.76% | 5.80% | 16.10% | 30.73% | 18.17% | 17.43% | 0.32% | 6.94% | 10.29% | 6.68% | 2.50% | 1.63% |
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.27% | 3.89% | 4.85% | 5.86% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 8.60% | 15.66% | 8.03% | 17.82% |
Drawdowns
DHSCX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHSCX drawdown since its inception was -53.15%, roughly equal to the maximum ARSMX drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHSCX and ARSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHSCX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.15% | -51.75% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -12.25% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.41% | -19.34% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.19% | -42.96% | -3.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.21% | -10.31% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.36% | -8.12% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 4.04% | -0.16% |
Volatility
DHSCX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 3.68%. This indicates that DHSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DHSCX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 3.68% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 11.17% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.79% | 18.46% | +5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 17.87% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 19.59% | +2.54% |