PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHSB vs. OMAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHSB vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHSB achieves a 4.21% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 4.56% return.


DHSB

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.26%
YTD
4.21%
6M
5.04%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OMAH

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.44%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.00%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHSB vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DHSB and OMAH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.54

The correlation between DHSB and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHSB vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHSB
DHSB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DHSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHSB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DHSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHSB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHSB vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DHSBOMAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.25

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.82

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.55

9.48

+6.07

DHSB vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHSB and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHSBOMAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.43

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.70

+0.12

Drawdowns

DHSB vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHSB drawdown since its inception was -7.65%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHSB and OMAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHSBOMAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-11.83%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.32%

-3.00%

-0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-2.65%

+2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-1.26%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

1.21%

-0.58%

Volatility

DHSB vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that DHSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHSBOMAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

1.93%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.20%

5.49%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70%

8.05%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.63%

13.21%

-4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.63%

13.21%

-4.58%

DHSB vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHSB has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHSB vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

DHSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHSB and OMAH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHSB has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHSB dropped -7.65% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.44% vs 9.84% for DHSB. On fees, DHSB is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHSB is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 1.20% for DHSB.

They also come from different issuers: Day Hagan and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DHSB and 0.95% for OMAH.

DHSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHSB and OMAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer