DHSB vs. OMAH
DHSB (Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DHSB returned 9.84% vs 11.44% for OMAH. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DHSB charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
DHSB vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHSB achieves a 4.21% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 4.56% return.
DHSB
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 4.21%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHSB vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DHSB Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF | 4.21% | 6.01% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 4.56% | 6.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHSB and OMAH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between DHSB and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHSB vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
DHSB
OMAH
DHSB vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DHSB | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.25 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.82 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | 9.48 | +6.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DHSB | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.43 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.70 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
DHSB vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHSB drawdown since its inception was -7.65%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHSB and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHSB | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -11.83% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | -3.00% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -2.65% | +2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -1.26% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 1.21% | -0.58% |
Volatility
DHSB vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that DHSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHSB | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 1.93% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.20% | 5.49% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.70% | 8.05% | -2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.63% | 13.21% | -4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.63% | 13.21% | -4.58% |
DHSB vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHSB has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHSB vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
DHSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DHSB Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF | 1.20% | 1.25% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.44% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHSB and OMAH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHSB has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHSB dropped -7.65% vs OMAH's -11.83%.
On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.44% vs 9.84% for DHSB. On fees, DHSB is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DHSB is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 1.20% for DHSB.
They also come from different issuers: Day Hagan and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DHSB and 0.95% for OMAH.
DHSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHSB and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer