DHRAX vs. UMMGX
DHRAX (Diamond Hill Core Bond Fund) and UMMGX (Columbia Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DHRAX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for UMMGX.
Performance
DHRAX vs. UMMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DHRAX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.48%
- 5Y*
- 0.65%
- 10Y*
- —
UMMGX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHRAX vs. UMMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHRAX Diamond Hill Core Bond Fund | 0.37% | 6.55% | 3.18% | 6.20% | -12.05% | -1.24% | 7.60% | 7.63% | 1.28% | 3.75% |
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund | 0.03% | 8.03% | 2.06% | 6.73% | -15.66% | -0.79% | 9.10% | 9.23% | -0.50% | 3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHRAX and UMMGX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DHRAX and UMMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHRAX vs. UMMGX — Risk / Return Rank
DHRAX
UMMGX
DHRAX vs. UMMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Core Bond Fund (DHRAX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DHRAX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DHRAX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | — | — |
Drawdowns
DHRAX vs. UMMGX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHRAX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility
DHRAX vs. UMMGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHRAX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.50% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | — | — |
DHRAX vs. UMMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHRAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than UMMGX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHRAX vs. UMMGX - Dividend Comparison
DHRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than UMMGX's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHRAX Diamond Hill Core Bond Fund | 4.43% | 4.02% | 4.72% | 4.05% | 2.63% | 1.99% | 2.05% | 2.49% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund | 3.41% | 4.20% | 3.70% | 3.73% | 2.73% | 1.76% | 4.77% | 4.21% | 2.71% | 1.88% | 4.66% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHRAX and UMMGX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DHRAX and UMMGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer