PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHMBX vs. DNLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHMBX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DHMBX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHMBX achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than DNLDX's 11.62% return. Over the past 10 years, DHMBX has underperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 2.44%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.00% annualized return.


DHMBX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.94%
6M
3.21%
1Y
8.64%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
-0.26%
10Y*
2.44%

DNLDX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.52%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.64%
1Y
21.35%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHMBX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHMBX
BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
2.94%2.64%4.41%6.50%-17.25%5.58%2.85%10.76%1.64%12.78%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
11.62%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DHMBX and DNLDX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2005

-0.07

The correlation between DHMBX and DNLDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHMBX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHMBX
DHMBX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DHMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DHMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHMBX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DHMBX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DHMBXDNLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.28

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.88

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

10.82

-1.87

DHMBX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHMBX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHMBXDNLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

1.60

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.56

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.51

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.55

+0.17

Drawdowns

DHMBX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHMBX drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHMBX and DNLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHMBXDNLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.66%

-63.69%

+36.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-7.29%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.55%

-20.42%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.90%

-23.42%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.90%

-42.23%

+19.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-0.09%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-9.63%

+4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.94%

-0.92%

Volatility

DHMBX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DHMBX) is 1.39%, while BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that DHMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHMBXDNLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

3.34%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

9.53%

-6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84%

13.10%

-9.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.16%

18.48%

-12.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

19.51%

-13.45%

DHMBX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHMBX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHMBX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

DHMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than DNLDX's 13.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHMBX
BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4.01%5.37%3.96%3.13%3.09%2.47%3.46%4.19%4.13%3.66%4.95%4.50%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.46%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHMBX and DNLDX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNLDX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to DHMBX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHMBX dropped -27.66% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

DHMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHMBX and DNLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer