DHDG vs. FBUF
DHDG (FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DHDG returned 15.18% vs 19.61% for FBUF. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DHDG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.
Performance
DHDG vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHDG achieves a 7.00% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's 5.32% return.
DHDG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 7.00%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 15.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBUF
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHDG vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DHDG FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF | 7.00% | 11.43% | 0.48% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 5.32% | 14.01% | 1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHDG and FBUF is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DHDG and FBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHDG vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank
DHDG
FBUF
DHDG vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF (DHDG) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DHDG | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.53 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 3.51 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.11 | 15.68 | +1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DHDG | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 2.63 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 1.47 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
DHDG vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHDG drawdown since its inception was -8.26%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHDG and FBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHDG | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -11.09% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.66% | -5.61% | +1.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.22% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -1.38% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 1.25% | -0.36% |
Volatility
DHDG vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF (DHDG) is 0.93%, while Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that DHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHDG | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 1.11% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.29% | 5.37% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.37% | 7.49% | -2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 9.55% | -2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 9.55% | -2.07% |
DHDG vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHDG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHDG vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison
DHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DHDG FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 0.63% | 0.64% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHDG and FBUF have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBUF has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to DHDG (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHDG dropped -8.26% vs FBUF's -11.09%.
On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 19.61% vs 15.18% for DHDG. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DHDG has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 19.61% return vs 15.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DHDG.
FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for DHDG.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DHDG and 0.48% for FBUF.
DHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHDG and FBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer