PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DH2O.L vs. MINT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DH2O.L vs. MINT.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

DH2O.L (iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and MINT.L (PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - DH2O.L tracks the S&P Global Water Index (NET) (USD) while MINT.L tracks the PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DH2O.L returned 9.56%/yr vs 2.65%/yr for MINT.L. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

DH2O.L vs. MINT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DH2O.L achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly higher than MINT.L's 2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, DH2O.L has outperformed MINT.L with an annualized return of 9.56%, while MINT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.65% annualized return.

DH2O.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.85%
6M
0.83%
YTD
2.64%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
9.56%

MINT.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.39%
6M
2.17%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DH2O.L vs. MINT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		2.64%17.60%4.29%13.57%-20.83%30.67%15.22%33.60%-10.59%27.00%
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF		2.39%4.66%5.75%5.72%-0.67%-0.09%1.30%3.28%1.65%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between DH2O.L and MINT.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2011

-0.00

The correlation between DH2O.L and MINT.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

DH2O.L vs. MINT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DH2O.L
DH2O.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DH2O.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
MINT.L
MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DH2O.L vs. MINT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DH2O.LMINT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.52
7.86

-7.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.80
16.90

-16.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

3.57

-2.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

45.35

-44.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.53

232.26

-230.74

DH2O.L vs. MINT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DH2O.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the MINT.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DH2O.L and MINT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DH2O.L vs. MINT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DH2O.L drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than MINT.L's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DH2O.L and MINT.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DH2O.LMINT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-3.89%

-53.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-0.10%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-0.62%

-15.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.43%

-2.47%

-29.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.56%

-3.89%

-31.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.23%

0.00%

-5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-0.23%

-10.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

0.02%

+4.56%

Volatility

DH2O.L vs. MINT.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) at 0.14%. This indicates that DH2O.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DH2O.LMINT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

0.14%

+3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

0.35%

+10.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

0.58%

+13.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

0.76%

+15.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

0.95%

+15.53%

Dividends

DH2O.L vs. MINT.L - Dividend Comparison

DH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than MINT.L's 4.36% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.36%1.33%1.06%1.18%1.09%1.66%0.94%1.39%1.80%1.46%1.76%1.65%
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF		4.36%4.43%5.18%4.81%1.51%0.34%1.17%2.63%2.33%1.56%1.31%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

DH2O.L and MINT.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water Index (NET) (USD), while MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DH2O.L and MINT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer