PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGSE.L vs. SLVR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGSE.L vs. SLVR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend UCITS ETF (DGSE.L) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DGSE.L is traded in GBp, while SLVR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGSE.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR.L's 4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, DGSE.L has underperformed SLVR.L with an annualized return of 6.84%, while SLVR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.35% annualized return.


DGSE.L

1D
0.15%
1M
0.92%
YTD
10.61%
6M
11.47%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
8.09%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
6.84%

SLVR.L

1D
0.43%
1M
0.90%
YTD
4.04%
6M
27.59%
1Y
111.39%
3Y*
39.80%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGSE.L vs. SLVR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGSE.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend UCITS ETF
10.61%7.78%-0.93%9.14%-4.67%11.05%-0.71%8.36%-12.58%20.40%
SLVR.L
WisdomTree Silver
4.04%119.85%22.25%-7.44%14.41%-13.86%36.48%9.63%-4.80%-7.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DGSE.L and SLVR.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014

0.22

The correlation between DGSE.L and SLVR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (10 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGSE.L vs. SLVR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGSE.L
DGSE.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DGSE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGSE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGSE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DGSE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGSE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVR.L
SLVR.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGSE.L vs. SLVR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend UCITS ETF (DGSE.L) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGSE.LSLVR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.86

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

6.24

+0.45

DGSE.L vs. SLVR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGSE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGSE.L and SLVR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGSE.LSLVR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.93

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.58

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.46

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.29

+0.03

Drawdowns

DGSE.L vs. SLVR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGSE.L drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum SLVR.L drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGSE.L and SLVR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSE.LSLVR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-72.07%

+36.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-38.77%

+29.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-38.77%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.85%

-38.77%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-39.80%

+4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-33.71%

+31.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-43.50%

+35.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

17.80%

-14.89%

Volatility

DGSE.L vs. SLVR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend UCITS ETF (DGSE.L) is 4.43%, while WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) has a volatility of 17.02%. This indicates that DGSE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSE.LSLVR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

17.02%

-12.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

54.71%

-43.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.29%

57.51%

-44.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

35.17%

-21.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

31.09%

-15.37%

DGSE.L vs. SLVR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGSE.L has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVR.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGSE.L vs. SLVR.L - Dividend Comparison

DGSE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while SLVR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGSE.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend UCITS ETF
0.03%0.03%0.05%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.01%0.03%
SLVR.L
WisdomTree Silver
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGSE.L and SLVR.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SLVR.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SLVR.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for DGSE.L.

DGSE.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SLVR.L is Silver. DGSE.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SMID NR USD, while SLVR.L tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for DGSE.L and 0.49% for SLVR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGSE.L and SLVR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer