DGRP.L vs. EMAD.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

DGRP.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD) and EMAD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRP.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while EMAD.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRP.L returned 12.19%/yr vs 7.25%/yr for EMAD.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRP.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EMAD.L.

Performance

DGRP.L vs. EMAD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (DGRP.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DGRP.L is traded in GBp, while EMAD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMAD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRP.L achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than EMAD.L's 23.00% return.

DGRP.L

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 5.60%
• YTD: 6.65%
• 1Y: 14.83%
• 3Y*: 14.31%
• 5Y*: 12.19%
• 10Y*: —

EMAD.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -8.28%
• 6M: 15.83%
• YTD: 23.00%
• 1Y: 37.08%
• 3Y*: 20.09%
• 5Y*: 7.25%
• 10Y*: 9.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRP.L vs. EMAD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGRP.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD	6.65%	5.45%	21.38%	13.05%	2.72%	26.66%	9.97%	26.03%	-1.13%	15.25%
EMAD.L State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	23.00%	22.71%	13.06%	1.22%	-12.44%	-5.26%	24.47%	12.33%	-9.33%	30.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRP.L and EMAD.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2016	0.50

The correlation between DGRP.L and EMAD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (5 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DGRP.L vs. EMAD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRP.L

DGRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 62
DGRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
DGRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DGRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DGRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
DGRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

EMAD.L

EMAD.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
EMAD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
EMAD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EMAD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EMAD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EMAD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRP.L vs. EMAD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (DGRP.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGRP.L	EMAD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.65	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.21	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	3.11	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	8.65	+0.40

DGRP.L vs. EMAD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the EMAD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRP.L and EMAD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGRP.L vs. EMAD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.56%, smaller than the maximum EMAD.L drawdown of -34.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRP.L and EMAD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGRP.L	EMAD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.56%	-34.94%	+12.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.06%	-11.91%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.75%	-18.40%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.75%	-27.23%	+9.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-11.91%	+11.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-11.76%	+7.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	4.29%	-2.66%

Volatility

DGRP.L vs. EMAD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (DGRP.L) is 1.88%, while State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that DGRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMAD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGRP.L	EMAD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	9.61%	-7.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.32%	19.99%	-13.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.81%	22.45%	-13.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.56%	19.18%	-6.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.52%	19.50%	-3.98%

DGRP.L vs. EMAD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRP.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAD.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGRP.L vs. EMAD.L - Dividend Comparison

DGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while EMAD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGRP.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD	0.98%	1.11%	2.04%	1.99%	1.47%	1.34%	2.52%	2.78%	1.90%	1.36%
EMAD.L State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGRP.L and EMAD.L in my portfolio?

DGRP.L and EMAD.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DGRP.L or EMAD.L?

On fees, DGRP.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGRP.L or EMAD.L?

DGRP.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMAD.L.

What is the main difference between DGRP.L and EMAD.L?

DGRP.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EMAD.L is Asia Pacific Equities. DGRP.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while EMAD.L tracks MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for DGRP.L and 0.55% for EMAD.L.