DGRG.L vs. INTL.L
DGRG.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and INTL.L (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRG.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while INTL.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRG.L returned 12.91%/yr vs 17.23%/yr for INTL.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRG.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for INTL.L.
Performance
DGRG.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRG.L achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 49.02% return.
DGRG.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
INTL.L
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 19.68%
- YTD
- 49.02%
- 6M
- 48.14%
- 1Y
- 93.22%
- 3Y*
- 30.82%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRG.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRG.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 6.87% | 5.60% | 20.13% | 12.11% | 2.74% | 26.71% | 8.76% | 20.13% |
INTL.L WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 49.02% | 14.50% | 13.58% | 48.71% | -35.12% | 17.36% | 68.98% | 32.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRG.L and INTL.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between DGRG.L and INTL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DGRG.L vs. INTL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRG.L
INTL.L
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
DGRG.L
INTL.L
Healthcare
DGRG.L
INTL.L
Industrials
DGRG.L
INTL.L
Financial Services
DGRG.L
INTL.L
Communication Services
DGRG.L
INTL.L
Consumer Cyclical
DGRG.L
INTL.L
Consumer Defensive
DGRG.L
INTL.L
Energy
DGRG.L
INTL.L
-
Basic Materials
DGRG.L
INTL.L
-
Utilities
DGRG.L
INTL.L
-
Real Estate
DGRG.L
-
INTL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRG.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank
DGRG.L
INTL.L
DGRG.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRG.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.56 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 6.14 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 18.98 | -5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRG.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 3.71 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.67 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.94 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
DGRG.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.57%, smaller than the maximum INTL.L drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRG.L and INTL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRG.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.57% | -37.71% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.98% | -15.10% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | -33.54% | +15.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.72% | -36.92% | +19.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.88% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -10.99% | +8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 4.90% | -3.27% |
Volatility
DGRG.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) is 2.40%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that DGRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRG.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 9.37% | -6.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.19% | 18.48% | -12.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.86% | 24.97% | -16.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 25.61% | -13.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 26.28% | -11.83% |
DGRG.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRG.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRG.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DGRG.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRG.L and INTL.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRG.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRG.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INTL.L.
DGRG.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while INTL.L is Technology Equities. DGRG.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for DGRG.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.
Find the right allocation for DGRG.L and INTL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer