PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRG.L vs. FSWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRG.L achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than FSWD.L's 12.10% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRG.L has outperformed FSWD.L with an annualized return of 13.03%, while FSWD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.49% annualized return.


DGRG.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.59%
6M
5.35%
YTD
7.24%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
13.03%

FSWD.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
-0.61%
6M
10.73%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRG.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
7.24%5.60%20.13%12.11%2.74%26.71%8.76%24.78%-1.18%15.61%
FSWD.L
iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.10%17.16%18.87%9.04%-5.40%22.11%6.89%17.63%-7.35%15.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRG.L and FSWD.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.88

The correlation between DGRG.L and FSWD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRG.L vs. FSWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRG.L
DGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FSWD.L
FSWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FSWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRG.LFSWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

4.12

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

15.80

-6.49

DGRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FSWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRG.L and FSWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRG.L drawdown since its inception was -32.36%, smaller than the maximum FSWD.L drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRG.L and FSWD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRG.LFSWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.36%

-37.43%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

-5.90%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-19.93%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.72%

-19.93%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.57%

-26.27%

+3.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-1.42%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-7.38%

+2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.54%

+0.10%

Volatility

DGRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) is 2.14%, while iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that DGRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRG.LFSWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

2.86%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.35%

8.36%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.79%

10.94%

-2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.55%

18.86%

-6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

17.40%

-3.19%

DGRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRG.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FSWD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DGRG.L nor FSWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRG.L and FSWD.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FSWD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSWD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRG.L.

DGRG.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FSWD.L is Global Equities. DGRG.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while FSWD.L tracks STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for DGRG.L and 0.30% for FSWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRG.L and FSWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer