DGRG.L vs. EMRD.L
DGRG.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and EMRD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRG.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while EMRD.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRG.L returned 13.04%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for EMRD.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRG.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EMRD.L.
Performance
DGRG.L vs. EMRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DGRG.L is traded in GBp, while EMRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMRD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRG.L achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly lower than EMRD.L's 19.61% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRG.L has outperformed EMRD.L with an annualized return of 13.04%, while EMRD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.
DGRG.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 6.68%
- 1Y
- 14.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
EMRD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.93%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- YTD
- 19.61%
- 1Y
- 36.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
DGRG.L vs. EMRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRG.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 6.68% | 5.60% | 20.13% | 12.11% | 2.74% | 26.71% | 8.76% | 24.78% | -1.18% | 15.61% |
EMRD.L State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 19.61% | 24.62% | 9.53% | 4.25% | -11.24% | -1.33% | 14.49% | 12.91% | -8.97% | 24.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRG.L and EMRD.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016 | 0.52 |
The correlation between DGRG.L and EMRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.52 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRG.L vs. EMRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
DGRG.L
EMRD.L
DGRG.L vs. EMRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRG.L | EMRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 3.45 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.01 | 9.54 | -0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRG.L vs. EMRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRG.L drawdown since its inception was -32.36%, roughly equal to the maximum EMRD.L drawdown of -31.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRG.L and EMRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRG.L | EMRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.36% | -31.27% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.98% | -10.41% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | -15.26% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.72% | -22.35% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.57% | -27.33% | +4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -10.00% | +9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -10.35% | +5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 3.78% | -2.14% |
Volatility
DGRG.L vs. EMRD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) is 1.93%, while State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that DGRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRG.L | EMRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | 9.01% | -7.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.38% | 18.72% | -12.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 20.85% | -12.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 17.68% | -5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 19.03% | -4.81% |
DGRG.L vs. EMRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRG.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than EMRD.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRG.L vs. EMRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DGRG.L nor EMRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRG.L and EMRD.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMRD.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMRD.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRG.L.
DGRG.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EMRD.L is Emerging Markets Equities. DGRG.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while EMRD.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for DGRG.L and 0.18% for EMRD.L.
Find the right allocation for DGRG.L and EMRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer