PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRA.L vs. USDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRA.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DGRA.L is traded in USD, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DGRA.L having a 6.76% return and USDV.L slightly higher at 6.96%.


DGRA.L

1D
0.12%
1M
3.51%
YTD
6.76%
6M
6.13%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*

USDV.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.89%
YTD
6.96%
6M
7.95%
1Y
12.93%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRA.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRA.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
6.76%13.09%18.23%18.70%-8.32%25.27%12.58%28.83%-6.56%26.91%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
6.96%8.78%7.52%1.58%-0.35%25.59%0.26%24.49%-4.25%16.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRA.L and USDV.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRA.L and USDV.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRA.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRA.L
USDV.L

Technology

28.9%
8.9%

Healthcare

15.0%
6.2%

Industrials

11.3%
17.5%

Financial Services

10.7%
11.5%

Communication Services

8.6%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
17.0%

Energy

5.3%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.1%
6.4%

Utilities

0.4%
14.8%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Technology

DGRA.L
28.9%
USDV.L
8.9%

Healthcare

DGRA.L
15.0%
USDV.L
6.2%

Industrials

DGRA.L
11.3%
USDV.L
17.5%

Financial Services

DGRA.L
10.7%
USDV.L
11.5%

Communication Services

DGRA.L
8.6%
USDV.L
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRA.L
8.5%
USDV.L
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

DGRA.L
8.2%
USDV.L
17.0%

Energy

DGRA.L
5.3%
USDV.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

DGRA.L
3.1%
USDV.L
6.4%

Utilities

DGRA.L
0.4%
USDV.L
14.8%

Real Estate

DGRA.L

-

USDV.L
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRA.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRA.L
DGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRA.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRA.LUSDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.85

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

4.63

+5.77

DGRA.L vs. USDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the USDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRA.L and USDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRA.LUSDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.34

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.41

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.74

+0.17

Drawdowns

DGRA.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -31.66%, smaller than the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRA.L and USDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRA.LUSDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.66%

-35.73%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-6.96%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.17%

-15.11%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

-15.11%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-3.75%

+3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-3.39%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.79%

-0.88%

Volatility

DGRA.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) have volatilities of 2.43% and 2.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRA.LUSDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.40%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

6.87%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

9.63%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

13.84%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

15.76%

-0.84%

DGRA.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRA.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRA.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison

DGRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRA.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRA.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRA.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRA.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for DGRA.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRA.L and USDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer