PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRA.L vs. TFRN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRA.L vs. TFRN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) and WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD Acc (TFRN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRA.L achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly higher than TFRN.L's 1.82% return.


DGRA.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
4.94%
6M
4.71%
1Y
16.54%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
13.96%

TFRN.L

1D
0.02%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.82%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRA.L vs. TFRN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DGRA.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
4.94%13.09%18.23%18.70%-8.32%25.27%12.58%15.54%
TFRN.L
WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD Acc
1.82%4.10%5.44%4.94%2.04%-0.15%0.57%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRA.L and TFRN.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019

0.03

The correlation between DGRA.L and TFRN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRA.L vs. TFRN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRA.L
DGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TFRN.L
TFRN.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TFRN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFRN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFRN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
TFRN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFRN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRA.L vs. TFRN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) and WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD Acc (TFRN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRA.LTFRN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.63

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

4.10

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

35.75

-27.22

DGRA.L vs. TFRN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the TFRN.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRA.L and TFRN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRA.L vs. TFRN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -31.66%, which is greater than TFRN.L's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRA.L and TFRN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRA.LTFRN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.66%

-3.10%

-28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-0.98%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.18%

-0.98%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

-0.98%

-16.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

0.00%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-0.09%

-3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.11%

+1.83%

Volatility

DGRA.L vs. TFRN.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD Acc (TFRN.L) at 0.14%. This indicates that DGRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFRN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRA.LTFRN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

0.14%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

0.91%

+6.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.87%

1.92%

+8.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

1.51%

+12.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

1.88%

+13.15%

DGRA.L vs. TFRN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRA.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than TFRN.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRA.L vs. TFRN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DGRA.L nor TFRN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRA.L and TFRN.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TFRN.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TFRN.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRA.L.

DGRA.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TFRN.L is Government Bonds. DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while TFRN.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for DGRA.L and 0.15% for TFRN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRA.L and TFRN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer