DGRA.L vs. GLDW.L
DGRA.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc) and GLDW.L (WisdomTree Core Physical Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while GLDW.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRA.L returned 11.70%/yr vs 18.61%/yr for GLDW.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRA.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GLDW.L.
Performance
DGRA.L vs. GLDW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DGRA.L is traded in USD, while GLDW.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GLDW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRA.L achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly higher than GLDW.L's 3.71% return.
DGRA.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 32.41%
- 3Y*
- 31.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRA.L vs. GLDW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRA.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc | 6.76% | 13.09% | 18.23% | 18.70% | -8.32% | 19.95% |
GLDW.L WisdomTree Core Physical Gold | 3.71% | 65.15% | 26.05% | 12.92% | -0.13% | 6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRA.L and GLDW.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021 | 0.07 |
The correlation between DGRA.L and GLDW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (5 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRA.L vs. GLDW.L — Risk / Return Rank
DGRA.L
GLDW.L
DGRA.L vs. GLDW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) and WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRA.L | GLDW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 1.82 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 4.75 | +5.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRA.L | GLDW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.34 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 1.07 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.16 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
DGRA.L vs. GLDW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -31.66%, which is greater than GLDW.L's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRA.L and GLDW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRA.L | GLDW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.66% | -21.42% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.54% | -17.74% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.17% | -17.74% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.94% | -21.42% | +3.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -15.82% | +15.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -5.39% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 6.81% | -4.90% |
Volatility
DGRA.L vs. GLDW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) is 2.43%, while WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that DGRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRA.L | GLDW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | 5.73% | -3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 20.82% | -13.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.75% | 24.07% | -13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 17.35% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 17.18% | -2.26% |
DGRA.L vs. GLDW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRA.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDW.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRA.L vs. GLDW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DGRA.L nor GLDW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRA.L and GLDW.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDW.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDW.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRA.L.
DGRA.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GLDW.L is Precious Metals. DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while GLDW.L tracks Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for DGRA.L and 0.12% for GLDW.L.
Find the right allocation for DGRA.L and GLDW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer