PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGP vs. SHYL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGP vs. SHYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGP achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than SHYL's 1.15% return.


DGP

1D
-1.70%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
1.01%
6M
5.64%
1Y
57.52%
3Y*
57.85%
5Y*
30.49%
10Y*
20.46%

SHYL

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.57%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGP vs. SHYL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DGP
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes
1.01%141.40%53.16%16.97%-5.54%-11.29%45.29%32.27%-9.48%
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
1.15%7.78%8.52%11.39%-5.21%4.60%3.64%10.16%-0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DGP and SHYL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGP vs. SHYL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGP
DGP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGP Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SHYL
SHYL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGP vs. SHYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGPSHYLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

3.81

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

15.01

-10.96

DGP vs. SHYL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the SHYL Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGP and SHYL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGPSHYLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.90

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.72

-0.44

Drawdowns

DGP vs. SHYL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGP drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than SHYL's maximum drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGP and SHYL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGPSHYLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.31%

-19.26%

-56.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.58%

-1.59%

-34.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.58%

-4.73%

-31.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.24%

-9.60%

-41.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.78%

-0.23%

-32.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.09%

-1.54%

-39.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.24%

0.40%

+13.84%

Volatility

DGP vs. SHYL - Volatility Comparison

DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a higher volatility of 10.48% compared to Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) at 0.85%. This indicates that DGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGPSHYLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.48%

0.85%

+9.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.34%

2.45%

+43.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.47%

3.20%

+49.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.77%

5.84%

+32.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.04%

6.69%

+28.35%

DGP vs. SHYL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SHYL's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGP vs. SHYL - Dividend Comparison

DGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DGP
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
6.94%7.02%7.26%6.60%5.52%4.65%6.16%5.93%5.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGP and SHYL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGP has higher volatility (10.48%) compared to SHYL (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGP dropped -75.31% vs SHYL's -19.26%.

On 5-year performance, DGP leads with 30.49% vs 4.87% for SHYL. On fees, SHYL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SHYL has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGP has performed better with a 30.49% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHYL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGP.

SHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 0.00% for DGP.

DGP is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while SHYL is High Yield Bonds. DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%), while SHYL tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market 0-5 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DGP and 0.20% for SHYL.

SHYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGP and SHYL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer