DGP vs. GLD
DGP (DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - DGP is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%), while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGP returned 20.46%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for GLD. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DGP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
DGP vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGP achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, DGP has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 20.46%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return.
DGP
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 57.52%
- 3Y*
- 57.85%
- 5Y*
- 30.49%
- 10Y*
- 20.46%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
DGP vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | 1.01% | 141.40% | 53.16% | 16.97% | -5.54% | -11.29% | 45.29% | 32.27% | -7.48% | 24.20% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGP and GLD is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2008 | 0.96 |
The correlation between DGP and GLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGP vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
DGP
GLD
DGP vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGP | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.68 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.05 | 4.15 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGP | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.21 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 1.01 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.83 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.60 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
DGP vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGP drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGP and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGP | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -45.56% | -29.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.58% | -19.21% | -17.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.58% | -19.21% | -17.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.24% | -21.03% | -30.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.24% | -22.00% | -29.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.78% | -17.75% | -15.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -16.16% | -24.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.24% | 7.73% | +6.51% |
Volatility
DGP vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a higher volatility of 10.48% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that DGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGP | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.48% | 5.51% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.34% | 23.16% | +23.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.47% | 26.61% | +25.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.77% | 18.00% | +20.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.04% | 15.95% | +19.09% |
DGP vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGP vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither DGP nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DGP and GLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DGP has higher volatility (10.48%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGP dropped -75.31% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, DGP leads with 20.46% vs 13.12% for GLD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGP has performed better with a 20.46% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGP.
DGP and GLD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DGP is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLD is Gold. DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%), while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DGP and 0.40% for GLD.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGP and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer