PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGP vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGP vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGP achieves a -19.95% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.


DGP

1D
-4.99%
1M
-11.04%
6M
-29.70%
YTD
-19.95%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
46.51%
5Y*
26.51%
10Y*
16.18%

BITI

1D
2.65%
1M
1.46%
6M
34.68%
YTD
28.75%
1Y
68.34%
3Y*
-30.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGP vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DGP
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes
-19.95%141.40%53.16%16.97%-4.34%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
28.75%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between DGP and BITI is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.17

The correlation between DGP and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.15 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGP vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGP
DGP Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGP Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGP vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGPBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.26

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

2.72

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.27

6.78

-5.51

DGP vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGP Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGP and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGP vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGP drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGP and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGPBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.31%

-92.16%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.98%

-25.28%

-21.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.98%

-84.63%

+37.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.73%

-85.94%

+39.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.09%

-68.34%

+27.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.56%

10.11%

+9.45%

Volatility

DGP vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a higher volatility of 16.07% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 11.38%. This indicates that DGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGPBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.07%

11.38%

+4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.64%

34.25%

+14.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.50%

44.14%

+11.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.56%

52.28%

-12.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.41%

52.28%

-16.87%

DGP vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGP vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

DGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.10%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.10%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
DGP
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGP and BITI have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGP has higher volatility (16.07%) compared to BITI (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGP dropped -75.31% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, DGP leads with 46.51% vs -30.65% for BITI. On fees, DGP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 11.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DGP has performed better with a 46.51% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 0.00% for DGP.

DGP is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%), while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DGP and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGP and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer