DGLO vs. SCHO
DGLO (First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGLO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. DGLO is actively managed, while SCHO is passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGLO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHO.
Performance
DGLO vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGLO achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.66% return.
DGLO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- YTD
- 16.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 3.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
DGLO vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DGLO First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF | 16.25% | 1.61% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.66% | 1.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGLO and SCHO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGLO vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank
DGLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHO
DGLO vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF (DGLO) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGLO | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGLO vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGLO drawdown since its inception was -7.74%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGLO and SCHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGLO | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -5.69% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -0.08% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -0.61% | -1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility
DGLO vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGLO | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.23% | 1.41% | +13.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 1.99% | +13.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 1.56% | +13.67% |
DGLO vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGLO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGLO vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
DGLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than SCHO's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGLO First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF | 0.58% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGLO and SCHO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DGLO.
SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.58% for DGLO.
DGLO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DGLO and 0.03% for SCHO.
Find the right allocation for DGLO and SCHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer