PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGJA vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGJA vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - January (DGJA) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DGJA

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.46%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBUF

1D
-1.97%
1M
0.41%
YTD
3.46%
6M
4.08%
1Y
17.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGJA vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DGJA and FBUF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGJA vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGJA

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGJA vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - January (DGJA) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DGJA vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGJAFBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.72

1.35

+0.37

Drawdowns

DGJA vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGJA drawdown since its inception was -3.79%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGJA and FBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGJAFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-11.09%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-1.98%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-1.37%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

Volatility

DGJA vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGJAFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.88%

7.76%

-1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.88%

9.63%

-3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.88%

9.63%

-3.75%

DGJA vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGJA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGJA vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

DGJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DGJA and FBUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DGJA.

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for DGJA.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DGJA and 0.48% for FBUF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGJA and FBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer