PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DGIT.L is traded in GBp, while DRVE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DRVE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGIT.L achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than DRVE.L's 40.66% return.


DGIT.L

1D
1.17%
1M
10.23%
YTD
2.64%
6M
0.90%
1Y
1.12%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*

DRVE.L

1D
-1.76%
1M
9.58%
YTD
40.66%
6M
38.55%
1Y
89.84%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DGIT.L
iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc
2.64%-3.01%24.03%25.52%-28.82%-6.32%
DRVE.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
40.66%19.86%-3.40%21.24%-27.04%-1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between DGIT.L and DRVE.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021

0.50

The correlation between DGIT.L and DRVE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGIT.L
DRVE.L

Technology

42.7%
34.0%

Communication Services

19.1%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
26.8%

Industrials

10.6%
19.4%

Real Estate

5.9%

-

Financial Services

5.5%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

14.4%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

DGIT.L
42.7%
DRVE.L
34.0%

Communication Services

DGIT.L
19.1%
DRVE.L
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DGIT.L
16.0%
DRVE.L
26.8%

Industrials

DGIT.L
10.6%
DRVE.L
19.4%

Real Estate

DGIT.L
5.9%
DRVE.L

-

Financial Services

DGIT.L
5.5%
DRVE.L

-

Healthcare

DGIT.L
0.1%
DRVE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

DGIT.L
0.1%
DRVE.L

-

Basic Materials

DGIT.L

-

DRVE.L
14.4%

Energy

DGIT.L

-

DRVE.L

-

Utilities

DGIT.L

-

DRVE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGIT.L
DGIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
DGIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DRVE.L
DRVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGIT.LDRVE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.58

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

8.44

-8.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.11

23.89

-23.78

DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGIT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGIT.L and DRVE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGIT.LDRVE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

3.82

-3.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.27

+0.19

Drawdowns

DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGIT.L drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, roughly equal to the maximum DRVE.L drawdown of -38.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGIT.L and DRVE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGIT.LDRVE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.95%

-38.87%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.67%

-10.59%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.07%

-33.14%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.94%

-2.18%

-6.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-17.15%

+6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.16%

3.75%

+6.41%

Volatility

DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L) is 5.28%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) has a volatility of 10.49%. This indicates that DGIT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRVE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGIT.LDRVE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

10.49%

-5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

17.64%

-4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.16%

23.43%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.37%

33.86%

-14.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

33.86%

-14.84%

DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGIT.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DRVE.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGIT.L vs. DRVE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DGIT.L nor DRVE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DGIT.L and DRVE.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGIT.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGIT.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRVE.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DGIT.L and 0.50% for DRVE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGIT.L and DRVE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer