PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGFFX vs. TPINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGFFX vs. TPINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGFFX achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than TPINX's 2.14% return.


DGFFX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.95%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*

TPINX

1D
0.14%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.35%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
2.33%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
0.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGFFX vs. TPINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
2.55%5.84%8.04%7.82%-6.09%4.91%3.59%6.64%-0.35%3.57%
TPINX
Templeton Global Bond Fund
2.14%15.02%-11.95%2.45%-6.17%-5.06%-4.41%0.63%1.26%-1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DGFFX and TPINX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2017

0.28

The correlation between DGFFX and TPINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGFFX vs. TPINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGFFX
DGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TPINX
TPINX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TPINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TPINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPINX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGFFX vs. TPINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGFFXTPINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.02

1.17

+0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.93

1.05

+5.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.39

3.44

+27.95

DGFFX vs. TPINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGFFX Sharpe Ratio is 4.04, which is higher than the TPINX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGFFX and TPINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGFFXTPINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04

0.92

+3.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.60

-0.10

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.77

+0.76

Drawdowns

DGFFX vs. TPINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGFFX drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum TPINX drawdown of -26.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGFFX and TPINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGFFXTPINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-26.45%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-6.36%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.38%

-13.03%

+9.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.17%

-19.15%

+10.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-13.05%

+13.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-4.84%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

1.93%

-1.23%

Volatility

DGFFX vs. TPINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) is 0.68%, while Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) has a volatility of 2.13%. This indicates that DGFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGFFXTPINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

2.13%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

5.93%

-4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05%

7.23%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.42%

8.13%

-5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

7.27%

-4.67%

DGFFX vs. TPINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGFFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TPINX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGFFX vs. TPINX - Dividend Comparison

DGFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, more than TPINX's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
6.24%5.52%6.81%4.95%3.37%4.14%4.22%4.18%3.79%2.94%0.00%0.00%
TPINX
Templeton Global Bond Fund
5.03%4.29%5.77%3.87%5.17%5.38%4.59%6.12%6.53%3.34%2.33%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGFFX and TPINX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPINX has higher volatility (2.13%) compared to DGFFX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGFFX dropped -12.69% vs TPINX's -26.45%.

DGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGFFX and TPINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer