DGCFX vs. IBND
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio (DGCFX) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND).
DGCFX is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. It was launched on Jan 10, 2018. IBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. It was launched on May 19, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DGCFX or IBND.
Correlation
The correlation between DGCFX and IBND is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
DGCFX vs. IBND - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DGCFX:
1.06
IBND:
0.48
DGCFX:
1.51
IBND:
0.75
DGCFX:
1.19
IBND:
1.09
DGCFX:
0.38
IBND:
0.17
DGCFX:
3.93
IBND:
1.04
DGCFX:
1.14%
IBND:
3.73%
DGCFX:
4.24%
IBND:
8.14%
DGCFX:
-22.37%
IBND:
-35.63%
DGCFX:
-6.06%
IBND:
-17.38%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGCFX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than IBND's 4.86% return.
DGCFX
0.99%
-0.11%
0.38%
4.84%
1.14%
N/A
IBND
4.86%
0.24%
-0.20%
3.88%
0.33%
0.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DGCFX vs. IBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGCFX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DGCFX vs. IBND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DGCFX
IBND
DGCFX vs. IBND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio (DGCFX) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DGCFX vs. IBND - Dividend Comparison
DGCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than IBND's 2.45% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGCFX DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio | 4.38% | 4.40% | 4.04% | 2.26% | 1.68% | 1.55% | 1.92% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | 2.44% | 2.61% | 2.08% | 0.54% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
DGCFX vs. IBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGCFX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, smaller than the maximum IBND drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGCFX and IBND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DGCFX vs. IBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio (DGCFX) is 1.41%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that DGCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with DGCFX or IBND
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
VUG vs FOCPX
FOCPX vs VUG is absolutely incorrect. I ran the same comparison on Morning star and FOCPX has out performed but your graph shows the opposite.
what is the source of this data. is it trust worthy.
SK
Does Portfolio Performance Consider Historical Composition?
When I see the past performance of a particular portfolio, does it mean the performance of the current composition, or do I get the performance by weighting the portfolio against all its old compositions?
It is very important to learn about the success of the portfolio.
MOTTY