DGAGX vs. TRLGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DGAGX (BNY Mellon Appreciation Fund, Inc.) and TRLGX (T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, DGAGX returned 12.73%/yr vs 18.24%/yr for TRLGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGAGX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TRLGX.

Performance

DGAGX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Appreciation Fund, Inc. (DGAGX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DGAGX having a 3.42% return and TRLGX slightly lower at 3.32%. Over the past 10 years, DGAGX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 12.73%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.

DGAGX

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 3.42%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 10.92%
• 3Y*: 11.95%
• 5Y*: 7.73%
• 10Y*: 12.73%

TRLGX

• 1D: -1.71%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 17.88%
• 3Y*: 24.67%
• 5Y*: 12.21%
• 10Y*: 18.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGAGX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGAGX BNY Mellon Appreciation Fund, Inc.	3.42%	10.14%	12.35%	21.37%	-17.86%	27.10%	23.96%	35.22%	-6.59%	26.60%
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund	3.32%	17.51%	37.57%	46.22%	-35.26%	23.24%	39.57%	28.51%	4.35%	37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DGAGX and TRLGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2001	0.88

The correlation between DGAGX and TRLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DGAGX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGAGX

DGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 12
DGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
DGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
DGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
DGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
DGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

TRLGX

TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 15
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGAGX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Appreciation Fund, Inc. (DGAGX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGAGX	TRLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	1.21	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	1.71	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.21	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	1.04	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.01	3.29	+0.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGAGX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGAGX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGAGX	TRLGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	1.21	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.55	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.84	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.58	+0.07

Drawdowns

DGAGX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGAGX drawdown since its inception was -48.80%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGAGX and TRLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGAGX	TRLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.80%	-55.56%	+6.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.21%	-18.18%	+6.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.43%	-21.17%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.13%	-40.44%	+13.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.99%	-40.44%	+8.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-2.60%	+0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.13%	-8.68%	+1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	5.73%	-2.92%

Volatility

DGAGX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Appreciation Fund, Inc. (DGAGX) is 3.02%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that DGAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGAGX	TRLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.02%	3.80%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.28%	12.46%	-3.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.91%	15.68%	-3.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.68%	22.39%	-5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.79%	21.76%	-3.97%

DGAGX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGAGX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGAGX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

DGAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.49%, more than TRLGX's 13.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGAGX BNY Mellon Appreciation Fund, Inc.	19.49%	21.12%	17.23%	7.44%	9.16%	3.91%	5.29%	10.52%	21.70%	16.17%	27.17%	31.89%
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund	13.25%	13.69%	9.80%	2.04%	3.88%	2.56%	0.42%	4.09%	7.93%	9.27%	1.64%	4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGAGX and TRLGX in my portfolio?

DGAGX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGAGX or TRLGX?

TRLGX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to DGAGX (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGAGX dropped -48.80% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.