PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFYGX vs. TSDUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFYGX vs. TSDUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFYGX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than TSDUX's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, DFYGX has underperformed TSDUX with an annualized return of 1.42%, while TSDUX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.68% annualized return.


DFYGX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.52%
1Y
2.42%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
1.42%

TSDUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.77%
6M
1.88%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFYGX vs. TSDUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFYGX
DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio
1.41%2.16%5.15%5.00%-3.02%-0.51%0.38%2.20%1.42%0.29%
TSDUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund
1.77%3.24%6.04%5.94%0.41%-0.11%2.06%2.65%1.64%1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DFYGX and TSDUX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2016

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFYGX vs. TSDUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFYGX
DFYGX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DFYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DFYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

TSDUX
TSDUX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TSDUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSDUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSDUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TSDUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSDUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFYGX vs. TSDUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFYGXTSDUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.25

3.14

-0.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

8.75

-6.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.81

28.64

-19.83

DFYGX vs. TSDUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFYGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the TSDUX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFYGX and TSDUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFYGX vs. TSDUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFYGX drawdown since its inception was -4.46%, which is greater than TSDUX's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFYGX and TSDUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFYGXTSDUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-3.94%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.04%

-0.41%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.04%

-0.73%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.36%

-1.72%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.46%

-3.94%

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-0.19%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

0.13%

+0.16%

Volatility

DFYGX vs. TSDUX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX) has a higher volatility of 0.37% compared to Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX) at 0.17%. This indicates that DFYGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSDUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFYGXTSDUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.17%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.60%

0.52%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29%

0.97%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.24%

1.11%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.00%

1.09%

-0.09%

DFYGX vs. TSDUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFYGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDUX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFYGX vs. TSDUX - Dividend Comparison

DFYGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than TSDUX's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFYGX
DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio
2.80%2.04%4.84%3.07%1.14%0.00%0.27%1.87%1.82%1.01%0.58%0.49%
TSDUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund
2.91%3.09%5.03%1.55%6.36%0.60%1.65%2.84%2.66%2.22%1.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFYGX and TSDUX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFYGX has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to TSDUX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFYGX dropped -4.46% vs TSDUX's -3.94%.

TSDUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFYGX and TSDUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer