DFYGX vs. BUBSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFYGX (DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio) and BUBSX (Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, DFYGX returned 1.43%/yr vs 2.51%/yr for BUBSX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFYGX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BUBSX.

Performance

DFYGX vs. BUBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with DFYGX at 1.41% and BUBSX at 1.41%. Over the past 10 years, DFYGX has underperformed BUBSX with an annualized return of 1.43%, while BUBSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.51% annualized return.

DFYGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: 3.92%
• 5Y*: 1.99%
• 10Y*: 1.43%

BUBSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 4.11%
• 3Y*: 4.96%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: 2.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFYGX vs. BUBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFYGX DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio	1.41%	2.16%	5.15%	5.00%	-3.02%	-0.51%	0.38%	2.20%	1.42%	0.29%
BUBSX Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund	1.41%	4.53%	5.47%	5.43%	0.70%	-0.05%	1.66%	2.87%	1.61%	1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DFYGX and BUBSX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2014	0.16

The correlation between DFYGX and BUBSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFYGX vs. BUBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFYGX

DFYGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
DFYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
DFYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DFYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DFYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DFYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

BUBSX

BUBSX Risk / Return Rank: 100
BUBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BUBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BUBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BUBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BUBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFYGX vs. BUBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFYGX	BUBSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	6.62	-4.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	23.03	-20.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.55	12.11	-9.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	41.98	-39.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.22	305.78	-296.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFYGX vs. BUBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFYGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the BUBSX Sharpe Ratio of 6.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFYGX and BUBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFYGX	BUBSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	6.62	-4.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.62	4.56	-2.93
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.44	3.59	-2.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.85	3.16	-1.30

Drawdowns

DFYGX vs. BUBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFYGX drawdown since its inception was -4.46%, which is greater than BUBSX's maximum drawdown of -1.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFYGX and BUBSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFYGX	BUBSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.46%	-1.88%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.04%	-0.10%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.04%	-0.29%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.36%	-0.83%	-3.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.46%	-1.88%	-2.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	0.00%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-0.07%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.29%	0.01%	+0.28%

Volatility

DFYGX vs. BUBSX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX) has a higher volatility of 0.34% compared to Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUBSX) at 0.16%. This indicates that DFYGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFYGX	BUBSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	0.16%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.54%	0.43%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26%	0.62%	+0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.24%	0.76%	+0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.00%	0.70%	+0.30%

DFYGX vs. BUBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFYGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than BUBSX's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFYGX vs. BUBSX - Dividend Comparison

DFYGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than BUBSX's 4.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUBSX Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund	4.04%	4.24%	5.04%	4.39%	1.29%	0.25%	1.14%	2.33%	1.90%	1.04%	0.81%	0.56%
DFYGX DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio	2.80%	2.04%	4.84%	3.07%	1.14%	0.00%	0.27%	1.87%	1.82%	1.01%	0.58%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFYGX and BUBSX in my portfolio?

DFYGX and BUBSX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFYGX or BUBSX?

DFYGX has higher volatility (0.34%) compared to BUBSX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFYGX dropped -4.46% vs BUBSX's -1.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.62 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.