DFUV vs. FZROX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) and FZROX (Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund) are both funds - DFUV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while FZROX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, DFUV returned 19.61%/yr vs 22.49%/yr for FZROX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFUV charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FZROX.

Performance

DFUV vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUV achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly higher than FZROX's 12.01% return.

DFUV

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 16.95%
• 6M: 18.53%
• 1Y: 34.65%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FZROX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 6M: 11.92%
• 1Y: 29.16%
• 3Y*: 22.49%
• 5Y*: 13.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUV vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	16.95%	15.77%	11.79%	13.25%	1.22%
FZROX Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund	12.01%	17.23%	23.94%	26.20%	-2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUV and FZROX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.82

The correlation between DFUV and FZROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFUV vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUV

DFUV Risk / Return Rank: 88
DFUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DFUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DFUV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DFUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DFUV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FZROX

FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUV vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFUV	FZROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.96	2.47	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.12	3.36	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.45	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.80	3.39	+2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.03	15.66	+5.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFUV vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUV and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFUV	FZROX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96	2.47	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.73	+0.17

Drawdowns

DFUV vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUV drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum FZROX drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUV and FZROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFUV	FZROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.60%	-34.96%	+17.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.01%	-8.89%	+2.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.60%	-19.38%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	0.00%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-5.51%	+1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	1.92%	-0.27%

Volatility

DFUV vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) have volatilities of 3.11% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFUV	FZROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	2.99%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.47%	9.22%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.80%	12.22%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	17.44%	-1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	20.13%	-3.89%

DFUV vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUV has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFUV vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than FZROX's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	1.35%	1.55%	1.64%	1.72%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FZROX Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund	0.91%	1.02%	1.16%	1.36%	1.57%	1.25%	1.27%	1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFUV and FZROX in my portfolio?

DFUV and FZROX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFUV or FZROX?

DFUV has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to FZROX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUV dropped -17.60% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.