DFUSX vs. FGJEX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX).

DFUSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 23, 1999. FGJEX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

DFUSX vs. FGJEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DFUSX vs. FGJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio	-7.05%	24.80%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	-2.99%	24.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUSX achieves a -7.05% return, which is significantly lower than FGJEX's -2.99% return.

DFUSX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -7.66%
• YTD: -7.05%
• 6M: -4.63%
• 1Y: 14.38%
• 3Y*: 17.12%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

FGJEX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -7.13%
• YTD: -2.99%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUSX vs. FGJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUSX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FGJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.

FGJEX

Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z

DFUSX

DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio

Return for Risk

DFUSX vs. FGJEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUSX

DFUSX Risk / Return Rank: 43
DFUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
DFUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
DFUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DFUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DFUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUSX vs. FGJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFUSX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.25	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFUSX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	2.09	-1.67

Correlation

The correlation between DFUSX and FGJEX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DFUSX vs. FGJEX - Dividend Comparison

DFUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than FGJEX's 9.88% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio	1.14%	1.04%	1.24%	4.17%	6.24%	6.57%	3.82%	2.74%	2.64%	1.56%	1.95%	2.87%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	9.88%	9.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DFUSX vs. FGJEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUSX drawdown since its inception was -54.96%, which is greater than FGJEX's maximum drawdown of -8.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUSX and FGJEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFUSX	FGJEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.96%	-8.32%	-46.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.88%	-8.32%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.66%	-1.05%	-9.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFUSX	FGJEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.96%	10.78%	+7.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	10.78%	+6.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	10.78%	+7.25%