DFTIX vs. DFSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFTIX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX).
DFTIX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 29, 2012. DFSMX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Aug 19, 2002.
Performance
DFTIX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFTIX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFTIX DFA Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | -0.08% | 3.70% | 1.12% | 4.29% | -3.69% | -0.50% | 3.66% | 4.59% | 1.34% | 2.14% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.55% | 2.30% | 2.84% | 2.98% | -0.36% | -0.11% | 0.83% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 1.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFTIX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than DFSMX's 0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, DFTIX has outperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 1.48%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.23% annualized return.
DFTIX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 2.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.48%
DFSMX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFTIX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DFTIX and DFSMX have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DFTIX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank
DFTIX
DFSMX
DFTIX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFTIX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFTIX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 3.68 | -2.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 6.50 | -4.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 3.20 | -1.75 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 4.59 | -3.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | 21.83 | -16.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFTIX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 3.68 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 2.11 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 1.60 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.78 | -1.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFTIX and DFSMX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DFTIX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison
DFTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than DFSMX's 2.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFTIX DFA Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.78% | 2.32% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.47% | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.36% | 1.47% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.43% | 2.08% | 2.80% | 1.94% | 0.63% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.94% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
DFTIX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFTIX drawdown since its inception was -8.02%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTIX and DFSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFTIX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -2.66% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -0.39% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.09% | -1.67% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.02% | -1.69% | -6.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -0.06% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -0.24% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 0.10% | +0.55% |
Volatility
DFTIX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFTIX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.11%. This indicates that DFTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFTIX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 0.11% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.10% | 0.37% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71% | 0.68% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 0.78% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.43% | 0.77% | +1.66% |